This article in the Economist seems to suggest that game is better than money itself.

To quote the Economist “The things that money can buy are merely means to an end—social status—that brings desirable reproductive opportunities. If another route brings that status more directly, money is irrelevant.”

And since good game brings social status, and reproductive opportunities, game is actually better than money.

Oh yeah, did I mention that I teach game? I do! You can sign up above.

Be Sociable, Share!

•